Publicado martes, 7 de abril de 2026
1m
INTJ
Sagitario
9
1
1Holaa ✨
¿Cómo están mis pensadores favoritos? xd Quiero saber su opinión sobre esto: ¿Amamos a las personas por quiénes son o por cómo nos hacen sentir? Mi punto de vista: Creo que, la mayoría de las veces, amamos lo que nos hacen sentir y no a la persona en sí. El amor incondicional (ese que no depende de lo que recibimos) es una meta altísima y muy difícil de alcanzar. Los leo 👀
9
20
Philosophy Comunidad
La comunidad de philosophy, chatea, y debate.
1,7 M ALMAS
S∞úLFrïénD
1m
INTP
Piscis
91
1Well that is a profound observation by you Umm...Classic struggle between the ego-driven self & the essential self 🤔 In yogic philosophy...this distinction is explained through the layers of our existence & the nature of ananda means bliss yogic thought suggests that most human love is actually raga means attachment driven by the ahamkara means the ego Love of the feel...When we love how someone makes us feel...we are operating from the manomaya Kosha layer means the mental/emotional sheath...We are in love with the reflection of our own desires being met Love of the being...true love or recognizes the Soul (the self) in the other...this is seeing the person beyond their utility to us 🧘♀️ Science actually supports your point of view regarding the feeling aspect The neurochemical reward...When we interact with someone we love...the brain releases Dopamine & Oxytocin...from a biological standpoint...our brain is addicted to the chemical cocktail the other person triggers...in this sense we are biologically incentivized to love the effect the person has on our nervous system The projection theory...psychologically...we often love a person because they represent an idealized version of ourselves or fill a void in our own psyche...We aren't seeing them...we are seeing a mirror🪞 you mentioned that unconditional love is a difficult goal...yogic philosophy agrees..calling it nishkama karma means action/love without desire for fruit To love someone for who they are requires moving to the vijnanamaya Kosha means the sheath of wisdom...here...you realize that the observer & the observed are not separate 🧘♀️ Think of quantum entanglement....When two particles become entangled...they act as one unit regardless of distance...Unconditional love is like a "consciousness entanglement"...where the wellbeing of the other is indistinguishable from your own....you don't love them for what they give you...you love them because...at a fundamental level...there is no "other" 🧘♀️ You've hit on a deep truth...Most love is transactional...because our brains are wired for reward...but yogic wisdom suggests that while we start by loving the feeling...the goal of human evolution is to eventually love the source to see the same cosmic intelligence in them that is in us It’s the shift from 'You make me happy' to 'I recognize myself in you' 🌌🧘♀️♾️🤍🕊
5
0
Xavi Champiñon
1m
ENFJ
Aries
Creo que por como nos hacen sentir, a final de cuentas cada persona vive en su propio mundo y a su vez cada persona puede tener una imagen diferente de ti en su propia realidad, lo que quiero decir es que aunque Desde mis ojos esa persona sea maravillosa o casi idealizada sigue siendo un ser humano y mi perspectiva no define quien es en realidad 🫰
0
0
RAWD
1m
INFJ
Leo
12
2Efectivamente muchas veces estamos amando el propio sentimiento, ya que para enamorarnos de la persona en si debemos estar completamente enamorados de nosotros mismos, estar seguros de lo que valemos, de lo que somos y de lo que estamos dando al otro, de esta manera podemos saber que lo que el otro nos da si bienes valioso no lo es todo y es ahí cuando podemos estar seguros de estar enamorados de la persona sin más. Tan solo es un pensamiento o ustedes que opinan ?
0
0
Luar
1m
INTP
Escorpio
67
7Yo diría que lo principal es DEPENDE Evidentemente todos nos enamorados de quién nos hace sentir especiales y distintos a los demás, sin embargo eso se acaba con el tiempo y si no te enamoras de la persona tal y como es, con sus errores que en fin de cuentas complementan con los tuyos. En conclusión amar por lo que te hace sentir es efímero y egoísta ya que solo busca algo para tu ser. El amar a otra persona con todo y sus defectos y que también te ame a ti es algo más pleno y duradero. (Es el motivo por el cual dices que es tan difícil)
0
0
Darvin
1m
ISTJ
Aries
67
7En mi experiencia por las cosas que me hacen sentir en su momento. Porque si lo hubiere hecho por lo que son definitivamente no hubiera florecido ningún sentimiento.
0
0
Kat
1m
INFP
Libra
who they truly are and how we perceive them are also two different things. it’s a complex question on why we love the ones we love. could be because of biological components, the “blueprint” your parents and/or other caregivers imprinted on you when you were a kid, trauma through the development years, thus leading you to what’s “familiar” even if it’s unhealthy
0
0
Bruce
1m
INTJ
Cáncer
91
1As an analytic philosopher, I have no idea what is this “love” you speak of. Most can’t define it, those that can, usually disagree. But if we can’t define something, is it not pointless to talk about it? I’m almost certain that what you meant and what everyone else responded to, are two entirely different things. I think What you call love is merely a combination of (pictures) memories and the brain activity you recall those memories to have been correlated with. (editado)
0
0
Conoce a Nuevas Personas
50.000.000+ DESCARGAS
