Boo

Vi står for kjærligheten.

© 2024 Boo Enterprises, Inc.

MS
MS

14d

INFP

Skytten

2
1

History is written by the Victor!

The use of nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has long been debated. Did these bombings truly end World War II, or were they meant to demonstrate U.S. dominance to the allies and the world? While it is argued that the bombings forced Japan to surrender, thereby ending the war, the morality of killing hundreds of thousands of civilians to achieve this goal remains highly contentious. Do the ends justify the means in this case, or were there other motives behind such a devastating decision? I think that if the Nazi army bombed a city with a nuclear bomb it would be considered as a war crime but it's not a war crime only because the victorious side did it! Actually, I'm this was both sides had no ethics or mercy and both sides where criminals and committed war crimes, but the history is written by the Victor!

History is written by the Victor!

8

24

Kommentar

History Fellesskap

history-fellesskapet, chatten og diskusjonen.

BLI MED NÅ

1,5 mill. SJELER

best
ny
No
No

14d

INTJ

Skytten

6
5

Im not sure if bombing of London was considered a war crime, im not sure about Dresden either. I don’t think the Japanese would have easily given up.

1

19

Svar

Aemilius
Aemilius

14d

INFJ

1
2

Well, it didn't save us from anime...

2

1

Svar

MS
MS

13d

INFP

Skytten

2
1

@No I didn't say that Hitler was a good one, I only said that Hitler, Churchill, Stalin, De Gaulle and Roosevelt were war criminals too as their armies did the same things!

0

0

Svar

Møt Nye Folk

20 000 000+ NEDLASTINGER

BLI MED NÅ