我們主張以愛為出發點。

© 2024 Boo Enterprises, Inc.

Jesse Cruz
Jesse Cruz

3月

INTJ

雙子座

5
4

The Telephone Game

#psychology #cognitivefunctions #science #physics There's a popular saying “If you can't explain it to a 6-year-old, you don't understand it yourself.” A modern enough take. We go further back. “If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.” Same value. Different value. Go further back. "One ought to lend themselves to so simple a description, that even a child could understand." Surely this must be the actual quote. But wait, there's more. "Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone." And yet we are still not done... "Its great value lies in the logical simplicity with which it explains apparently conflicting facts in the operation of natural law It provides a more simple method. Hitherto science has been burdened by many general assumptions of a complicated nature." A beautiful saying. One that the author himself had to live by it. One that society has continued to refine. Perhaps too much. Perhaps not enough, or at least not in the right way. Einstein wrote this to his fellow colleagues. A simple enough philosophy that requires very little cognitive ability to understand, yet also requires massive cognitive function to enact. Psychologically speaking, may we have also been playing the telephone game, Pavloving ourselves to reinforce our own precepts and notions on what intelligence is? On what it means to strive for deeper insight and revelation on ever so shifting paradigms of truth? Has modern day specialization actually left us farther away from the bigger picture, forcing newer and newer generations to consciousnessly[sic] evolve and adapt to better suit society, leaving most to unnaturally fixate on one area, one spot of the jigsaw puzzle? Perhaps. Yet, I am assured, ever more so in the present day, that there are also those who have fixated on something quite special. Those whose sole focus is on recognition. Those who are never late, curiously enough. Those who have said goodbye to mundane worldly thoughts, and instead allow themselves to wonder the possibilities. Where we shall go from here. I don't know. As long as we get somewhere, that shall be good enough. Fini.

6

5

評論

Philosophy 社區

philosophy 社區、聊天和討論。

立即加入

89萬用戶

最佳
最新
P

P

3月

INTJ

射手座

5
4

Einstein is an interesting case, as he is basically at or near the beginning of "modern" physics, having his hand in both foundational theories (QM and GR). Do you have attributions for the quotes? I could not find any at first pass, but likely just missed it. Also, it is amusing that Einstein creates one of the more mathematically complicated theories (the tensor fields are a bit of a bear, as i understand it), then asserts everything should be "simple". It feels like context is missing. Which highlights the quandary... the idea as stated is a lie of the most pernicious type: one that people want to be true. The issue is that the fundamental ideas of science are, at times, simple... if you understand the math, which is the "language comprehensible to everyone". However, most people do not (and possibly cannot) learn and comprehend the levels of math necessary. That is, even if they can recite the equations, they lack understanding for the derivation and context of what the equations mean. Thus, science communicators are left using metaphor and allegory, often with only partial context, to oversimplify what they are talking about. Ultimately, this leaves the audience believing the metaphors, but lacking understanding of the truth behind the metaphors, which can make them susceptible to the rise of pseudoscience using terminology such as "quantum", "energy", "resonance", and "frequency", which are legitimate terms in science but are rarely used by these pseudoscientists in the same way. Perhaps a better way of stating it would be that a "theory or description thereof should be as simple as possible, and no simpler" as a means of highlighting the importance of not losing sight of accuracy and specificity, as well as harkening back to the importance of Occam's Razor.

1

4

回复

遇見新朋友

超過30,000,000+ 次下載

立即加入

相關帖子

#philosophy

Аnn
Аnn

1月

ISFJ

金牛座

6
5

当天的问题

是什么让你快乐?

2

2

#philosophy

Ebz
Ebz

2月

ESFJ

金牛座

I think buying suscription is overrated

So I can’t see likes sorry :/

12

4

#philosophy

WangYang
WangYang

2月

ESTJ

獅子座

天青色等烟雨,而我在等你

天青色等烟雨,而我在等你

3

2

#philosophy

WangYang
WangYang

2月

ESTJ

獅子座

重要的是陪伴

重要的是陪伴

2

0

#philosophy

Asmer
Asmer

3月

INFJ

魔羯座

I never had a Real BF or went on a date with anyone , am i the only one ? Just asking 😅

3

3

#philosophy

Andy
Andy

4月

ENTP

天秤座

心理学

孤独并不是来自身边无人。感到孤独的真正原因是因为一个人无法与他人交流对其最要紧的感受

心理学

3

1

#philosophy

Andy
Andy

4月

ENTP

天秤座

心灵

心灵无疑是我们人类身上既熟悉又陌生的神秘“不速之客

1

0

#philosophy

Jay
Jay

3月

INTJ

白羊座

8
7

Life. 🧘🏻🖕🏻

Life. 🧘🏻🖕🏻

8

3

#philosophy

José
José

4月

INFJ

魔羯座

4
5

有情饮水饱,无情食饭饥

3

0

#philosophy

Brian
Brian

3月

ENFJ

白羊座

Words of wisdom #4

It ain't about how hard you're hit. It's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.

2

1

#philosophy

Vitor✌️
Vitor✌️

5月

INTJ

水瓶座

6
7

城市就是森林,每一个男人都是猎手,每一个女人都是陷阱。

重溫 三體 原著有感 🤔🤔

3

0

#philosophy

Cyrus
Cyrus

5月

ENTJ

水瓶座

2
1

经典金句

来分享哪个是你最喜欢的精彩句子吧!😁 我最喜欢从《爱情公寓》的一段, 人生是一场单程的旅行,即使有些遗憾,我们也没有从头再来的机会。 与其纠结无法改变的过去,不如微笑着,珍惜未来,因为生活,没有如果。

1

0

#philosophy

Trevor
Trevor

7月

INTJ

水瓶座

7
8

重要

人生,快不快樂很重要, 日子,好不好過很重要, 心情,愉不愉快很重要, 其他,重不重要不重要。 朱德庸

2

0

#philosophy

Thomas
Thomas

9月

INFJ

巨蟹座

8
7

人类是不是工作得有点过多?

你不认为过度生产和过度消费会推动对人类的更大剥削吗?而且很多时候,消费只是在满足我们的自我吗?

7

1

#philosophy

Larry
Larry

2年

ENTJ

天秤座

新年快乐!

🐯(已編輯)

17

3

#philosophy

Remington Keyes
Remington Keyes

11月

ENFP

水瓶座

2
1

约会

因此,如果我完全理解此页

2

0

#philosophy

Денис
Денис

1年

ENTP

白羊座

9
1

人到什么程度还是人?

如果一个半机械人是机器和人的混合体。一个人应该剩下多少才算得上是人而不是机器?如果只剩下心脏,他到底还是不是人,如果他的大脑还在?一个人在什么时候会不再被认为是人类?

5

5

#philosophy

Daniel
Daniel

1年

INTJ

金牛座

发生在你身上的事情并不重要,重要的是你对此的反应

发生在你身上的事情并不重要,重要的是你对此的反应

10

0